A Conflict Over a Musical Sample
The dispute began in 2024, when emPawa Africa — a company linked to the Nigerian composer Dera (Ezeani Chidera Godfrey) — sued Bad Bunny for allegedly using without authorization a fragment of the song “Empty My Pocket” (2019) in “Enséñame a bailar” from the album Un Verano Sin Ti.We recommend reading:Bad Bunny, Taylor Swift, Rosalía and Sabina awarded at the Odeón Awards in Spain
The plaintiffs maintained that the sample was not only present in the instrumental, but that it "permeates the entire song," and claimed to have previously notified the artist's team without receiving a response. The artist's legal team included lawyers with fees of up to $680 per hour (Kirby Lee-Imagn Images)
At the time, the lawyers even questioned the singer's conduct, pointing out that “it is not very common for a musical artist of the caliber and sophistication of Bad Bunny to use music from another person without permission, and then ignore that person's efforts to resolve the problem”.
However, the artist's defense presented a completely different version: the use of the sample had been authorized by another copyright holder of the original work, the producer Lakizo. This point became the central focus of the case.
The litigation did not reach a resolution on the merits. In early March 2026, federal judge Otis Wright dismissed the legal dispute with prejudice — that is, definitively — after the plaintiffs stopped moving forward with the case. According to the resolution cited by Billboard, Dera “did not respond in time” to a key deadline set by the court, which led to “the court dismissing this action and all claims filed in it”. The situation worsened after the law firm Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP, which represented the plaintiffs, withdrew from the case in January 2026 due to "irreparable differences" with its clients. Without legal representation, both the artist and the company stopped filing documents and meeting court deadlines. Following the dismissal, Bad Bunny's legal team went on the offensive. In their request for reimbursement, the lawyers maintain that the accusation "lacked merit from the beginning" and was driven by financial motives. The album Un Verano Sin Ti spent 13 weeks at number one on the Billboard 200. (photo: El Colombiano) "This case should never have been brought," notes the document cited by Billboard. "emPawa presented it and litigated aggressively, apparently expecting that Bad Bunny's wealth, prominence, and desire to avoid legal fees and bad publicity would allow emPawa to obtain an undeserved multimillion-dollar settlement." Furthermore, the defense accuses the company of having deliberately prolonged the process, using tactics to "delay and postpone" the litigation, before withdrawing in the evidence discovery phase. A relevant detail is that the reimbursement request does not target Dera personally. According to the defendants, they consider that the composer "was not the main person responsible for processing the claim, nor did he finance the litigation."You can also read:Judge dismisses lawsuit against Bad Bunny for alleged unauthorized sample
Bad Bunny's request falls within a relatively common practice in copyright disputes in the United States. The law allows the winning party to recover their legal fees if they can demonstrate that the claims were frivolous or unreasonably managed. This type of measure seeks to discourage unsubstantiated lawsuits. Recent cases include Mariah Carey, who also requested millionaire compensation after winning a lawsuit, or the rapper Nelly, who claimed tens of thousands of dollars in similar circumstances.








